Documenting Systematic Failures

One homeowner's documented fight against Gjensidige and Tryg — insured through IDA, Denmark's engineering union. 8 cases, systematic rejections, broken law, and Catch-22 tactics. All documents, all facts, publicly available.

8 Cases
273.360 kr. Claimed (DKK)
1.7% Paid out
8 Violations
229 Days silence

Insured through IDA — failed by Tryg and Gjensidige

The insurance policies in these cases were purchased through IDA Forsikring, the insurance offering of IDA — Denmark's professional association for engineers and technology professionals with over 130,000 members. IDA Forsikring partners with Tryg for home and contents insurance.

When a professional union recommends an insurance solution to its members, there is a legitimate expectation that the product meets basic standards of claims handling, legal compliance, and fair treatment. The 8 cases documented on this site raise a fundamental question:

Do IDA's insurance agreements truly protect their members' interests — or do they primarily serve the insurers' bottom line?

The documentation shows a pattern of systematic rejections, legal violations, and Catch-22 tactics by both Gjensidige (home insurance) and Tryg (legal expenses insurance). When the legal expenses insurance refuses coverage for the lawsuit needed to resolve the home insurance claim, the circle is complete — and the policyholder stands alone.

Case Overview

Case Insurer Description Claimed Paid Status
Case 1: Electrical Damage... Gjensidige Upon taking ownership of the property, the Claimant discovered multiple electrical faults and hidden structural problems. 9.500 kr. 4.650 kr. Partially covered
Case 2: Moisture and Roof Holes Gjensidige The Claimant discovered water infiltration through the roof, caused by holes where solar panels had been routed through the roof structure. 5.300 kr. 0 kr. Rejected — below deductible threshold
Case 3: Massive Foundation Cracks Gjensidige The Claimant discovered massive cracks in the house's foundation — visible structural damage threatening the entire building's integrity. 0 kr. Court case — legal escalation
Case 4: Asbestos in the Soil Gjensidige During excavation work on the property, the Claimant discovered buried asbestos roof tiles. 0 kr. Insurance Board — awaiting decision
Case 5: Basement Floor Buckling Gjensidige Upon removing fixed carpeting in the basement, the Claimant discovered severe cracks and buckling in the basement floor. 13.560 kr. 0 kr. Insurance Board — complaint filed
Case 6: Sewage and Rats Gjensidige The Claimant discovered a break in the private sewer line on the property. 245.000 kr. 0 kr. Rejected — Board complaint under consideration
Case 1: Legal Aid Refused Tryg The Claimant has an ongoing court case against the previous property owner (Case 3 — foundation cracks). 0 kr. Rejected — Board complaint filed
Case 2: Appeal of Legal Aid Refusal Tryg This case is a formal appeal of Tryg's refusal of legal aid coverage (Tryg Case 1). 0 kr. Active complaint at Insurance Board

Gjensidige Forsikring

Partially covered

Case 1: Electrical Damage and Hidden Rooms

479044 — 2024-06-12

Upon taking ownership of the property, the Claimant discovered multiple electrical faults and hidden structural problems.

Claimed: 9.500 kr. Paid: 4.650 kr.
Rejected — below deductible threshold

Case 2: Moisture and Roof Holes

481530 — 2024-07-11

The Claimant discovered water infiltration through the roof, caused by holes where solar panels had been routed through the roof structure.

Claimed: 5.300 kr. Paid: 0 kr.
Court case — legal escalation

Case 3: Massive Foundation Cracks

484124 — 2024-08-16

The Claimant discovered massive cracks in the house's foundation — visible structural damage threatening the entire building's integrity.

Claimed: — Paid: 0 kr.
Insurance Board — awaiting decision

Case 4: Asbestos in the Soil

513779 — 2025-05-21

During excavation work on the property, the Claimant discovered buried asbestos roof tiles.

Claimed: — Paid: 0 kr.
Insurance Board — complaint filed

Case 5: Basement Floor Buckling

525346 — 2025-09-25

Upon removing fixed carpeting in the basement, the Claimant discovered severe cracks and buckling in the basement floor.

Claimed: 13.560 kr. Paid: 0 kr.
Rejected — Board complaint under consideration

Case 6: Sewage and Rats

534383 — 2025-12-25

The Claimant discovered a break in the private sewer line on the property.

Claimed: 245.000 kr. Paid: 0 kr.

Tryg Forsikring

Rejected — Board complaint filed

Case 1: Legal Aid Refused

2025-01-01

The Claimant has an ongoing court case against the previous property owner (Case 3 — foundation cracks).

Claimed: — Paid: 0 kr.
Active complaint at Insurance Board

Case 2: Appeal of Legal Aid Refusal

2025-01-01

This case is a formal appeal of Tryg's refusal of legal aid coverage (Tryg Case 1).

Claimed: — Paid: 0 kr.

Documented Law Violations

See the full analysis of 8 systematic violation types (16 instances) identified across all cases.